Single Blog

Ano Ang Kahulugan Ng Agreement

The second challenge, Suzette Nicolas y Sombilon Vs. Alberto Romulo, et al. / Jovito R. Salonga, et al. Vs. Daniel Smith, et al. / Bagong Alyansang Makabayan, et al. Vs. President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, et al., on 2 January 2007, was re-decided by the Supreme Court on 11 February 2009. In deciding this second challenge, Court 9-4 (with two judges who inhibit) ruled that “the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) concluded on February 10, 1998 between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States is in accordance with the Constitution … The decision continued, particularly with respect to the subic Rape case, “… the Romulo-Kenney agreements of 19 and 22 December 2006 are not in accordance with the VFA and the Minister of Foreign Affairs, respondent, is responsible for negotiating without delay with the representatives of the United States the corresponding agreement on detention centres under the Philippine authorities, in accordance with Article V, para. VFA, until the status quo is maintained until further decisions of the Court. [13] UP professor Harry Roque, an adviser to former Senator Jovito Salonga, one of the petitioners in the case, said in a telephone interview about the decision on the consistency of the VFA. “We`re going to appeal…

We hope to be able to convince the other judges to join the four dissenters. [14] The agreement contains various procedural safeguards to protect due process rights and prohibit dual threats. [2] [VIII 2-6] The agreement also exempts Filipino personnel from visa formalities and ensures expedited entry and exit; [2] [IV] requires the United States to accept Philippine driver`s licenses; [2] [V] authorizes Philippine personnel to carry weapons to U.S. military facilities during deployment; [2] [VI] provides for exemptions and import/export duties for Filipino personnel; [2] [X, XI] requires the United States to provide medical care to Filipino personnel; [2] [XIV] and exempts Philippine vehicles, ships and aircraft from landing or port charges, shipping or overflight charges, road tolls or any other charge for the use of U.S. military installations. [2] [XV] Normally ang salitang pre-nuptial agreement ay nakikinig lang natin sa mga artista at mayayaman at kung minsan ay nagtataka tata kungayo para saan ang kaunduan na ito. Ano nga ba ito? Ayon sa Artikel 75 ng Familiencode, ang mga ikakasal ay pwedeng magkasundo kung ano ang gagamitin nilang property relation kung sila ay kasal na, ito ang tinatawag na pre-nuptial agreement. May tatlong pwedeng pagpilian ang ikakasal: The main effect of the agreement is to require the U.S. government to notify the Philippine authorities when it is aware of the arrest, arrest or detention of Filipino personnel visiting the United States and, if requested by the Philippine government, to ask the competent authorities to waive jurisdiction in favour of the Philippines, except in cases of particular interest to the United States.

[2] [VIII1] The waiver of U.S. jurisdiction is complicated because the United States is a federation of American states and therefore a federation of jurisdictions. KUNG WALANG PRE-NUPTIAL AGREEMENT, ANG AUTOMATIC NA GAGAMITIN NA PROPERTY RELATION NG MAG-ASAWA AY ANG ABSOLUTE COMMUNITY OF PROPERTY KUNG SAAN EQUAL NA HAHATIIN ANG LAHAT NA PROPERTY AT ANUMANG ARI-ARIAN NA NABILI O NAPUNDAR NG MAG-ASAWA EDH SILA IKASAL AT HABANG MAY BISA ANG KANILANG KASAL AT KAHIT HIWALAY NA SILA AT HINDI PA NAPAPAWALANG BISA ANG KASAL AY PARTE PA RIN NG CONJUGAL PROPERTY NA KANILANG PAGHAHATIAN NG PAREHAS.