Before Clinton sent her to the U.S. Senate, she added two parallel treaties, the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) and the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), to protect workers and the environment, and also to allay the concerns of many members of the House of Representatives. The United States has required its partners to adhere to environmental practices and regulations similar to their own. [Citation required] After much deliberation and lively discussion, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (234-200) on November 17, 1993. Among the supporters of the deal were 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill was passed by the Senate on November 20, 1993 by 61 et.  Supporters in the Senate were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Republican Rep. David Dreier of California, a staunch supporter of NAFTA since the Reagan administration, has played a leading role in mobilizing support for the deal among Republicans in Congress and across the country.   Methanex Corporation, a Canadian company, filed a $970 million lawsuit against the United States. Methanex claimed that a California ban on methyl tertbutyl ether (MTBE), a substance that had found its way into many of the state`s wells, was affecting the company`s methanol sales.
The lawsuit was dismissed and the company was ordered to pay $3 million to the United States. Government in costs, on the basis of the following reasoning: “But under general international law, a non-discriminatory settlement for public purposes, which is issued in accordance with due process and which concerns inter alios a foreign investor or a foreign investment, is not considered expropriated and compensable, unless the regulatory government has the presumed foreign investor then, of investments, specific obligations were given that the government would refrain from regulating. Ion.  NAFTA signatories have also recommended establishing standards for health, safety and industry. Members also agreed to expedite inspections and certifications of export products at the border and to eliminate the use of national standards as a barrier to trade. Much of the organized opposition to NAFTA has focused on fears that the removal of trade barriers will prompt U.S. companies to pack up and move to Mexico to take advantage of cheap labor. This concern grew in the early years of the 2000s, when the economy went through a recession and the recovery that followed turned out to be a “jobless recovery.” Opposition to NAFTA was also strong among environmental groups, who claimed that the anti-pollution elements of the treaty were woefully inadequate. This criticism has not diminished since the implementation of NAFTA. .